“Reservoir Dogs (1992)” Review

Purportedly the epitome of 90s cool.

Why did I watch it?

It’s Quentin Tarantino’s first film as director, and I enjoyed his Kill Bills.

Did it meet expectations?

I didn’t expect it to be so… theatrical. Most of this could’ve been staged on a large ‘warehouse’ set most effectively (and maybe it has, by now). It’s as gory as expected… albeit fairly briefly. I’m pretty squeamish so it does put me off. If I enjoy a Tarantino movie it’s despite the ultra-violence. I was surprised that Tarantino’s voice was the first I heard when I spun this disc – I knew he wrote and directed, I hadn’t realised he was in it, though he’s not one of the four or five leads who each get a turn in the spotlight. It’s Keitel’s performance that steals this, though, supported by Tim Roth. Buscemi is reliably jittery and Michael Madsen does well to stand out as a psycho amid the den of ruthless thieves. It’s cleverly structured storytelling, pacy, without any slack, and a satisfying and amusing culmination.

You should watch it if…

  • You enjoy theatrical cinema
  • Want to see an impressive debut

You shouldn’t watch it if…

  • You’re as squeamish as I am

Up next: Westworld (1973)

About Simon Wood

Lecturer in medical education, lapsed mathematician, Doctor Who fan and garden railway builder. See simonwood.info for more...

Leave a Reply

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.