“Westworld (1973)” Review

Nothing can possibly go wrong…

Why did I watch it?

Primarily because Eugene and Ben did a Fusion Patrol podcast episode on it, and I want to listen to what they had to say about the film that Eugene described to me as “sex with robots”.

Did it meet expectations?

Well, there’s certainly some sex with robots. In 2017 this is maybe not as much a novelty as it was in 1973 (though the Stepford Wives was only 2 years behind). It’s only one scene, and I found I was a bit surprised when their spines didn’t light up a la Battlestar Gallactica reboot.

This Michael Crichton film is known for its great premise – a theme park, peopled by androids – where you can play out your fantasies. These are in three different ‘worlds’ one themed on the wild west, one in an medieval castle (albeit still with androids programmed with American accents) and one in ancient Rome (again, not peopled by latin speakers). Although there are female visitors, these probably correspond somewhat more with male fantasies. You can kill the androids, you can sleep with them. This is all probably even more frightening in 2017 when it’s so close to being realised, and it makes me curious to watch the latest TV adaptation. The dehumanising effect is chilling.

The actual plot (the androids go wrong) is full of holes, but I spent my time worrying about the logistics of multiple guests in this world. There’s a cursory attempt to make sense of this at the start (the guns are actually electronically regulated with heat sensors) but this soon evaporates. What about the swords in the medieval zone – what stops you injuring another guest with one of those? How can you not get hurt in a bar brawl as you get hit by a chair? Come to that, if there’s no body heat from the androids, how convincing are these contraptions at copulating?

And are the horses real or not? (Because how come they’re so reliable?)

There’s an attempt to have cake and eat it with the sci-fi premise allowing the use not only of the western setting, but every available cliche of the genre. Still Yul Brynner does good work as the inhuman gunman.

You should watch it if…

  • You think westerns would be better with more sci-fi in them, or sci-fi better with more horses in it.

You shouldn’t watch it if…

  • Worrying about managing a theme park, where the guests are armed and can’t tell who else is human, is going to keep you awake at night…

Next up: The Hateful Eight (2015)

About Simon Wood

E-learning officer, lapsed mathematician, Doctor Who fan and garden railway builder. See simonwood.info for more...

2 thoughts on ““Westworld (1973)” Review

Leave a Reply